Wednesday 6 April 2011

After we reviewed the 8 feedback sheets we had managed to get filled in, we realised that there was no easy way of comparing them. The IMDB has a score out of 10, which makes it easy to rate the film as a whole, thus we created a system. We added up the scores for each section, and divided that number by how many numbers there were to get the average, for example, 9+10+8+8+10+8+9+7 = 69. and there were 8 numbers so we divide by 8, so 69 divided by 8 = 8.625, then we rounded to 1 decimal point which was 8.6, thus giving us the average score. (each average score is out of a highest possible 10)

We were very pleased with the average score of 8.9 for camera work, as we honestly did put a lot of effort into trying out lots of different camera angles, and experimented quite a bit to see if we could get any prodigy shots from trying things that were to be quite honest, long shots. (not the actual shot type long shot by the way!)

We were shocked with the average score of 7.4, it was much higher than expected! We realised that the sound in the clip wasn't edited to perfection, and we knew it needed a lot of work so we were pleased about that. Also, we were extremely pleased with the 8.6 average score for editing, seeing as it was only a rough copy and not even finished, so we were ecstatic with that result.

We then made an average score for the whole film opening by averaging the scores for each individual section. (8.6+7.4+8.9+7.9+8+8.1 = 48.9, divide by how many numbers = 6, 48.9 divided by 6 = 8.15, then round to one decimal place which is 8.2. Meaning our overall film rating for our draft is 8.2, which we personally thought was absolutely brilliant.

No comments:

Post a Comment